Robert Reich asked “who are we?” is a substack about the election results in the US. Here are are ome of my notes:
Implications for facilitating groups
- Always take time for people to get know each other. I usually ask them at the door, to write down their name, where they’re from and a open question about the intended subject of the meeting.
- Let everybody speak out at least their name. And – for instance – read out the answer to the open question. In Dutch the word for belonging has been derived from “hearing”, Hearing your voice induces a feeling of belonging.
- Share some personal issues. Real issues. Like “I’ve been invited to facilitate you”, or “I’ve designed this meeting to…”, or “this is my first time I’m doing this exercise….” . Or, my favourite: “we’ve already started … “.
- Allow time for “issues” to be spoken about. Not necessarily the topic of the meeting.
- (!) have participants work in small groups of at least five and at most five people. With less, three, it will become two against one, with four you can get a stale-mate, and most people don’t feel socially safe in groups of 6 or more participant,
- Treat everything that happens in your sessions as the only thing that can happen. Don’t make it your problem, so you don’t have to solve it yourself.
- People are happiest when working towards an attainable goal. State in your agenda some purpose, intention or goal and fix the end time. Stop then. All business is unfinished business.